“People must evolve for all human conflict a method which
rejects revenge, aggression and retaliation (Martin Luther King).” (Komives, and
Wagner). What a quote Cecilio Alvarez would use to start this chapter. No
matter what conflict there is in a group(s), the members of the group(s) must
with every effort, strength, intelligence and resources find a way to address
the conflict peacefully. Many a times, groups try to address conflicts by assigning
blame to a member or another group. This makes it easy for them to direct all harshness,
anger and frustrations on that person or group. Chapter 8 of Leadership for a
Better World brings to light a very important aspect of group operations that
for a long time has been an inhibiting factor for groups progress be it local,
regional, national or continental.
After reading the story involving the gorillas, it was not a
difficult task to link the moral of the story to the lives of student
organizations on campus, especially the Greek community. Most houses have inherited
disputes against each other and none of the officers try to work towards
addressing the issue. I remember last Greek week, when the pairings came out
one of our alumni told me we got the worst pairing. I asked why? He said the
big guys in the pairing will not call us out for anything; they would make all
the decisions and impose t-shirt fees and all on us without thinking of our
number because they don’t care. I told him the community was becoming more
united so if that happened during his years it does not guarantee it will
happen this year but it didn’t take long for me to say he was right. This trend
of neglecting smaller chapter by those houses started a long time ago and it is
going on but when any batch of officers experienced it they let it live and it
has become some sort of tradition which will live long if it is not stopped. My
house was not the only house, the other small house in the pairing experienced
it too so the two presidents took the initiative to tackle the issue, confront
the houses about it. We sent the presidents an e-mail expressing our feelings
and requested we all sit down as chapter heads to clear this issue; we had to
end the trend. We got a reply back which turned all that we expressed against
us. So we dropped everything. My point here is, since we did not come together
to tackle this controversy in a civilized manner it still persist. Their reply
was definitely retaliation but MLK says we must evolve a method that rejects
retaliation. There are many instances of inheriting conflicts in chapters and
between chapters. The question we need to ask ourselves is; How can we address
conflicts using methods that reject revenge, aggression, and retaliation?
One way is for us to confront these issues head-on. I
sometimes think that we are afraid we could worsen the case so we live it just
as it is and walk pass with our letters boldly on us saying we are Greeks.
Learn Lead Serve – we have to learn to accept that since nobody’s perfect there
will always be some sort of conflict but what leaders do is to confront the
issue, touch on each side of the story and come up with the best solution which
all agree with and not just anything that can work. During my term as
president, this quarter has been the toughest for me because on top of my 3
jobs, four critical classes I am probably barely going to pass 2 of them, my
brothers are angry at me that I am not doing my job. I am not present at every
event we schedule, so we had a round table to talk about this and I couldn’t
speak because every one of them was accusing me of not being at the house.
Wait! Did I not at the beginning of the quarter tell you guys I would be very busy
this quarter? So why these accusations, OK fine I am not able to make it to
some of these events but none of you take the time to come to my room, text me,
call me or e-mail me whatever goes on. My words started going on the track of
retaliation so I stopped and with the help of our adviser we came to a conclusion
that fits everybody. This is what the model is talking about, it’s not for brag
but when I read this chapter I felt we did a good job though knowing the issue
could be sensitive we help our horses and acted in a civil manner to resolve
the issue. When I realized my responses were coming out as if I wanted to
defend myself, thus retaliate to what they were saying I stopped talking and
listened. I just hope brothers would be brothers and understand when a brother
really needs to take care of some responsibilities other than join them play
beer pong or hang-out.
How do we know if we are heading towards a positive or
negative end with tackling controversy with civility? When we realize that the
discussion is becoming some sort of a debate, or some are taking sides and not
willing to accept another person’s point of view, it will be probably be ok to
shut the discussion down and try another time because time will be wasted and
the group will get nowhere near solutions for the discussion.